Arguments
Arguments
I've been noticing lately that arguments are so funny to watch. This isn't a peaceful debate. This is an argument. Now basically during arguments, this is the entire conversation. Let's just say these two people are arguing over who's better:warriors or cavs(it's cavs btw)
PERSON #1=Cavs are better than warriors
PERSON #2=Why? Warriors are better than the cavs.
PERSON #1=Warriors blew a 3-1 lead
PERSON #2=So? Warriors won more during the three final series rematch!
PERSON #1=(raises voice a bit) Blowing a 3-1 lead is worse than losing twice.
PERSON #2=(raises voice a bit) No? Losing twice is worse than blowing a 3-1 lead
PERSON #1=(raises voice a bit) "lists bunch of reasons" see?
PERSON #2=(raises voice a bit) "lists bunch of reasons" see?
PERSON #1=(says with rage) SO? WARRIORS BLEW A 3-1 LEAD
PERSON #2=(says with rage) SO? LOSING TWICE IS WORSE THAN THAT
PERSON #1=YOU #$%^&@ING $%^@%$$ YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT #$%@^ING #$%^$^ BASKETBALL. @#$$%$%#^@$#
PERSON #2=(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)
PERSON #1= OH YEAH? (bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)
Obviously that was an exaggeration. Lemme just show you what this entire conversation means.
PERSON #1=Cavs are better than warriors
(starts off calm with a statement)
PERSON #2=Why? Warriors are better than the cavs.
(disagrees)
PERSON #1=Warriors blew a 3-1 lead
(lists a reason)
PERSON #2=So? Warriors won more during the three final series rematch!
(lists a reason)
PERSON #1=(raises voice a bit) Blowing a 3-1 lead is worse than losing twice.
(Conversation gets more serious and they both hate each others ideas)
PERSON #2=(raises voice a bit) No? Losing twice is worse than blowing a 3-1 lead
(Contradiction)
PERSON #1=(raises voice a bit) "lists bunch of reasons" see?
(Basically each person now has their own "statement" where they just keep on repeating it, and no matter how much support of the statement he has, the other guy will just keep on disagreeing)
PERSON #2=(raises voice a bit) No!"lists bunch of reasons" see?
(Brings out his support)
PERSON #1=(says with rage) SO? WARRIORS BLEW A 3-1 LEAD
(This is when it gets out of hand)
PERSON #2=(says with rage) SO? LOSING TWICE IS WORSE THAN THAT
PERSON #1=YOU #$%^&@ING $%^@%$$ YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT #$%@^ING #$%^$^ BASKETBALL. @#$$%$%#^@$#
(Turns into a "who can talk louder and angrier" contest)
PERSON #2=(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)
(Lots of nonsense going on)
PERSON #1= OH YEAH? (bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)(bleep)
The point I'm trying to say here is that arguments are literally a waste of time. It starts off calm and ends violently. No matter how much one person says, the other person will always disagree, Giving a complete waste of time.
So please. If you ever recognize an argument similar to this style, just shut your mouth, because you're just wasting more time.
Lyrics of the Post: "we 'bout to turn it up"
I have a new tag:messages!
ReplyDeleteOnce in a while, you'll see a sentence or two at the end of each post. This is the message that I'm trying to bring out to the world. I found another post to edit and found that it fit the new tag "messages"! Try to find it ;) it shouldn't be hard because you can literally just press the "labels" button in the side. Like how there are two posts today? There will also be two posts on Christmas!
Lollllll
DeleteThese arguments really need some moderation.
2 MUCH SWEARINGGGGGG
People are very reasonable and competent when arguing LOlll
Nice tags. They're kinda like those morals at the end of fables, but modernized.
I FOUND THE TAG
DeleteI won't say which exactly
But I knew it was in lifestories!!!
You can now be a philosopher lol
nyce
Delete